WAR IS PEACE FREEDOM IS SLAVERY IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

Thursday, December 30, 2010

South African Government policy: Whites out/Blacks in



Shame on Canada, Shame on Jason Kenney

The sign on the wall speaks for itself. The signs these lovely ladies carry advocate prison for white folks.
The South African Governments unofficial official policy is to incrementally and purposely remove Whites from the continent. Gradually life in South Africa will become so dangerous for White people that they will flee or parish. They are tourists according to the racist genocidal organization Blackwash.





Clearly the South African Government is a part of the genocide that is being perpetrated by the lack of strong decisive action to control the murderous criminal behaviour of black on white. White citizens are targeted and the response from the Minister responsible for Justice states in parliament that if people don’t like the crime in South Africa they can leave. It is clear to whom he is referring to.

To be fair South Africa is a dangerous place for anyone black or white however the systemic reverse racism practised by blacks both in the government and outside makes for an environment that is extremely dangerous for whites. The following comes from a complaint lodged against the South African Government by an unnamed Boer farmer addressing the tactics of the government to the UN:

According to his analysis, "the ANC started their highly effective clandestine policy of genocide and crimes against humanity through the deliberate implementation and very effective utilisation of extremely high rates of extreme violent crime against white Afrikaner farmers during 1986 whilst still in exile".
When the ANC took power in government in 1994, these attacks were "escalated through deliberate state inaction, state neglect and refusal to act against crime".
Gun laws, which he said made it difficult to own a firearm, had "greatly contributed" to the rapid increase of crimes committed against the Afrikaner.

'Arsenal of genocidal weapons'
It is all an extension of the ANC's armed struggle and its goal was to "remove the white minority from South Africa".
Men were especially being targeted.
The ANC's "very effective arsenal of genocidal weapons" included:

* Incitement by high-ranking government officials through speeches
* Inaction against crime
* Underutilisation of security forces
* Draconian gun laws
* Removal of the rural commando
* The threat of the nationalisation of land
* A proposed media tribunal
* Using former MK soldiers to take the fight to the white community
* The disuse of the police force
* affirmative action

The UN defines genocide as: "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

* killing members of the group
* causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
* deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole in part
* imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
* forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."

Factors behind it could include conflicts over land, power, security and expressions of group identity such as language, religion and culture; patterns of discrimination, overt justification for discriminatory practices; a history of genocide or human rights violations against a particular group; denial by the perpetrators; references to past human rights violations committed against a possible perpetrator group as justification.

The farmer wrote that a team led by President Jacob Zuma and ANC Youth League president Julius Malema, described as the "Jacob Zuma-Malema team", supported by the South African Communist Party, had the potential to destroy the economy within months if there was no international intervention.

He asked, among other things, that Deng investigate his claims of rape and torture, raise international awareness of them, and commission a study of crime in South Africa.

Comment was not immediately available from the UN's New York office. - Sapa
Copyright 2010, Mail & Guardian

* South African rape of both white women and men is the highest in the world. Nowhere is this crime more prevalent. It is a victory dance on the ruins of a submitted people only the people that are responsible for any grievance claims are untouchable or long gone.

Canadian judge knocks claims by SA 'refugee'
Nov 28, 2010 12:00 AM | By SASHNI PATHER
---
Brandon Carl Huntley's bid for refugee status has been dealt a major blow by a Canadian judge, who ordered the South African to start the process again, from scratch.
---

BECAUSE I'M WHITE: Would-be refugee Brandon Carl Huntley
Two years ago Huntley, a 32-year-old martial arts fanatic from Cape Town, asked to be granted asylum as a refugee from South Africa where, he said, he faced fear, discrimination, harassment and possible death because of his race.

Canada's Immigration and Refugee Board granted Huntley's application last August after finding him a credible witness.

But his application was appealed by the Canadian government and this week Judge James Russell of the Canadian Federal Court quashed the board's decision, saying it was badly flawed.
Huntley had claimed he was attacked by black South Africans on "at least six or seven occasions" because of his white skin - but did not report any of the alleged attacks to police.

Huntley's lawyer, Russell Kaplan, had called his sister, Lara Kaplan, to the refugee board panel to testify about a terrifying home invasion attack on their brother in South Africa.

Giving evidence in Huntley's initial application, Lara said the South African police were "corrupt" and in "cahoots with the criminals".

In the latest judgment, Judge Russell questioned Lara's credibility.

In oral evidence to the board, Huntley had told of an attack by the losing team during a game of rugby in 2000 in Cape Town. In his analysis of the case, Judge Russell said: "What is interesting and significant is that the respondent (Huntley) obviously had no fear of playing rugby against an all-black team in a small industrial town as part of a mixed team that had three white players and 12 black players."

Asked whether he was afraid to play a team of underprivileged blacks in an "African area" Huntley had answered : "It depends where."

Huntley told the board of another attack: "Yeah, well my friend and I were at the, like the market you guys have here, we were at our version of the one in Cape Town and we were on our way home in the car and we seen an African trying to what looked like steal the car and we tried to stop him.

"About five of them came out from hiding and I got, my hand got, the palm of my hand got sliced and my friend got stabbed in the buttocks."

The court found there was no evidence to show that the attack was racially motivated.

Said Judge Russell: "There is no evidence that the black perpetrator knew he was trying to break into the car of a white person or indeed that it was a car belonging to a white person. The respondent and his friend came upon a crime in progress, decided to intervene and were just set upon by the gang. That is it."

Speaking after the decision this week, Huntley's legal counsel, Rocco Galati, said he was disappointed that a "selective view" of the matter had been taken.

"I feel it is an exercise in political correctness," he said.

Galati said his client would appeal the decision.

The court's decision compels the board to start afresh with a differently constituted panel. The hearing is likely to happen in a few months.

Huntley will remain in Canada until the finalisation of the legal processes.

Canada should kick political correctness down the road and let this fellow remain in Canada and become a citizen. Indeed Canada should open its doors to many more whites from South Africa. We accept people from every corner of the world as refugees but apparently only if you are of the Politically Correct pigment, that being any shade other than white.

Shame on us, shame, shame on YOU Mr. Kenney.

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Why Are Jews So Smart?

By Lewis Regenstein

The question has intrigued and baffled researchers for centuries. We all know people who defy the stereotype, yet it persists, demanding our attention. It leaves us wondering whether there is validity to the widespread belief that Jews are so much smarter than other people
But there can be little doubt that Jews have for centuries been substantially over-represented in many fields of learning and accomplishment. One must wonder, how could such a tiny, numerically insignificant group produce so many of the world’s smartest, most accomplished, and most influential people?
Jews comprise an amazing number of history’s most important figures, people who have had a profound impact on humanity: the Patriarch Abraham, whose life and teachings are considered sacred by Jews, Christians, and Moslems; Moses, the lawgiver to Jews and Christians; Jesus and his disciple, Paul, who founded and spread Christianity.
Looking back into the 20th century alone, one can clearly see that Jews have played many a key role in shaping the modern world (if not always in a positive way): physicist Albert Einstein; the father of psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud; Communism’s Karl Marx; developers of the polio vaccine Dr’s Jonas Salk and Albert Sabin; and the leading developers of the first atomic bomb, as inspired by Einstein’s theories – among them, Felix Bloch, Niels Bohr, Otto Frisch, Robert Oppenheimer, Leo Szilard, and Edward Teller. Indeed, Jews were so dominant in the field of nuclear physics in Europe throughout the 1930’s that it was often referred to as “Jewish physics.”
There is even some evidence of Elvis’ having Jewish ancestry!
Jews may not be history’s most popular people, but no other group has even come close to matching, proportionally, Jewish abilities and accomplishments. Combined with other commonly perceived Jewish traits such as ambition, curiosity, energy, imagination, and persistence, Jewish intelligence has elevated an incredible number of Jews to the top ranks of various fields.

Consider the following:
~The proportion of Jews with IQ’s of 140 or more is estimated to be about six times the proportion of any other ethnic group.
~ Although Jews constitute only about two-tenths of one percent of the world’s population, Jews won 29 percent of the Nobel Prizes in literature, medicine, physics and chemistry in the second half of the 20thcentury. So far this century, the figure is 32 percent. And these Jews of whom we speak were almost exclusively male Jews primarily of western European ancestry (less than one-tenth of one percent of the world’s population), in spite of pervasive discrimination, numerous legal barriers, frequent persecution, and the Holocaust.
~From 1870 until 1950, Jewish leadership in such fields as literature, music, visual arts, biology, chemistry, physics, mathematics, and philosophy equaled somewhere from four to fourteen times the Jewish proportion of the population in Europe and North America.
~In 1954, 28 children in the New York City public school system were found to have IQ’s of 170 or higher – 24 of these were Jewish.
And, of course, the extraordinarily high proportion of Jews in such fields as medicine, law, finance, literature, science, creative arts and the media is as obvious as it is astonishing. To some, these facts are awkward and even embarrassing, feeding stereotypes of “crafty” and “clever” Jews good at making money and flaunting their superiority to non-Jews. Indeed, the subject – the fact, if you will now allow -- of Jewish intellectual superiority is rarely if ever discussed in Jewish publications.
To explain this, we have a self-described “Scots-Irish gentile from Iowa,” Charles Murray of the American Enterprise Institute, author of the solidly documented “The Bell Curve”, which in 1994 stirred up a storm of controversy by discussing in not always politically correct language “differences in intellectual capacity among people and groups, and what those differences mean for America’s future.”
Murray has recently written a brilliant and convincing essay for the respected Jewish publication “Commentary,” on “Jewish Genius,” citing many of the above facts and material on which this article is based . This is the first time the magazine has systematically discussed this normally taboo topic that so many Jews are reluctant publicly to acknowledge.
Murray observes that the two most influential works of literature ever were written by and about Jews: the Hebrew and the Christian bibles, the so-called Old and New Testaments, and he goes on to cite numerous other examples of what can only be called Jewish intellectual supremacy.
Murray argues persuasively that “elevated Jewish intelligence is grounded in genetics” rather than being environmentally caused (by such factors as having books in the home), and that it is ‘substantially heritable.” And Jews, especially the Ashkenazim of central and western Europe, have been engaging for centuries in what basically amounts to selective mating and merging genes to produce children of high intelligence.
The Talmud (Pesahim 49a) says that “A man should sell all he possesses in order to marry the daughter of a scholar, as well as marry his daughter to a scholar.” In the Jewish community of the Middle Ages, the smartest men often became rabbis, and these learned men of high status were able to marry the daughters of successful merchants, thus “selecting” in favor of high intelligence.
At the same time, Christians were doing just the opposite: priests and monks of the dominant Roman Catholic Church – also usually among the best and brightest in their communities– were prohibited from marrying, thus “selecting out” through celibacy most of these intellectually superior men from the gene pool.
Murray also observes that “Sephardi Jews rose to distinction in many of the countries where they settled. Some economic historians have traced the decline of Spain after 1500 [following the expulsion of the Jews], and the subsequent rise of the Netherlands, in part to the Sephardi commercial talent that was transferred from one to the other.”
Murray’s scholarly and extensively documented article cites many other reasons for Jewish intellectual superiority in verbal and reasoning skills, including two crucial factors, which are often overlooked.
The most important of these can be found in an article entitled, “Jewish Occupational Selection,” and written by two scholars, Maristella Botticini and Zvi Eckstein. They focus on a decree issued in 64 C.E. by the martyred sage Joshua ben Gamla, high priest in the last years of the Second Temple, requiring that all males be enrolled in school by age six. The ordinance was largely adhered to, and, in the words of Murray, “Within about a century, the Jews, uniquely among the peoples of the world, had effectively established universal male literacy and numeracy.”
Moreover, throughout the centuries, Jewish males have had to study and learn the law, a process one never completes, and to read –often aloud in public -- in order to practice their faith and teach their children. Murray speculates that many Jews of low intelligence, who could not read well or fulfill the intellectual demands of their religion, tended to drift away from it.
Murray also cites a thesis of the geneticist Cyril Darlington, arguing that Jews were “decisively shaped much earlier,” during the period of the fall of Jerusalem and captivity under Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar in 586 B.C.E. According to the Bible (2 Kings 24:10-14), only the elite among the Israelites were taken to Babylon, leaving behind the unskilled and presumably less intelligent. The king “carried away all Jerusalem, and all the princes, and all the mighty men of valour… and all the craftsmen and the smiths; none remained, save the poorest sort of the people of the land.”
By the time the Israelites returned more than a century later, many of those who had remained had been killed off or had married foreigners and been absorbed by other peoples. The returned exiles reconstituted a Jewish community comprised largely of descendants of its most intelligent members. Ever since, practicing Jews have continued to try to perpetuate their “ethnic purity,” usually marrying within their own group, and resisting intermarriage with and assimilation by their neighbors.
But, still not satisfied by the evidence he so impressively presents, Murray continues to wonder about the intellectual prowess demonstrated from the very beginning by the Jewish people. “Why should one particular tribe at the time of Moses, living in the same environment as other nomadic and agricultural peoples of the Middle East, have already evolved elevated intelligence when others did not?”
The answer, speculates Murray, may be his “happily irrefutable’ hypothesis, drawn from the Jews’ earliest and most famous literary work: “The Jews are God’s chosen people.”

Monday, December 27, 2010

Kissinger, court Jews and ant-Semites

This column was originally published in the Jerusalem Post by Isi Leibler

Few would be shocked with details of further anti-Semitic outbursts by former president Richard Nixon revealed in the latest transcripts of tapes released from the Nixon library. He was a vulgar man whose foul mouthing extended beyond Jews to Afro-Americans, Irish-Americans, Italian-Americans and other ethnic groups. 

It is nevertheless ironic that Nixon's name tends to enrage most Jews who view him as an evil psychotic, whilst they continue to adore President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who during the Holocaust, denied entry to the US to Jews who could have been saved and was personally responsible for vetoing all efforts to intervene on behalf of European Jews being butchered by the Nazis. In fact, one could say that he acted in accordance with the Kissinger formula that "putting Jews into gas chambers was not an American concern." 

I believe that politicians must be judged by their deeds not by their words and their prejudices Nixon's anti-Semitism primarily amounted to appalling negative stereotyping. But he did employ a Jewish Secretary of State and, according to his Jewish speechwriter William Safire, his heroes included Benjamin Disraeli, Louis Brandeis, Felix Frankfurter and Herman Wouk. 

To me, Nixon was the president who, despite his unsavory character and negative traits, will be recorded in history as the leader who during the 1973 Yom Kippur War overruled his Jewish Secretary of State who sought to delay arms to Israel in order to boost Sadat and make Israel more pliable in negotiating with the Egyptians. Nixon's massive weapons airlift provided Israel with desperately needed arms. That he harbored dark prejudices against American Jews [who voted overwhelmingly against him] but admired Israelis, is ultimately of minor consequence. We should remain eternally grateful to him for having avoided countless additional Israeli casualties and possibly even having averted a disaster for the Jewish State. 

This brings us to Henry Kissinger, who people like Marty Perez of the New Republic, to this day still mistakenly credit with having influenced Nixon in 1973 to act on behalf of Israel. 

One need only read Yehuda Avner's recent book "The Prime Ministers" [pages 246-248], which provides transcripts of the Nixon tapes clearly demonstrating that it was the president who overruled his Jewish Secretary of State, ordering him to pull out all the stops to airfreight weapons to Israel at a critical turning point in the war. 

We are now privy to Kissinger's notorious outburst to Nixon following a meeting with Golda Meir during which she pleaded for the White House to support efforts to free Soviet Jews. What he subsequently said will undoubtedly haunt him for the rest of his life: 

"The immigration of Jews from the Soviet Union is not an objective of American foreign policy. And if they put Jews into gas chambers in the Soviet Union, it is not an American concern." He ended this obscene remark by conceding that gassing Jews "may be a humanitarian concern." 

Even in his worst moments, Nixon never suggested that he would stand aside whilst a replay of the Holocaust took place. It was Kissinger, the Jewish Secretary of State and himself a refugee from Nazi persecution who had he remained in Germany would probably have been gassed, made this obscene remark. As it was, he lost 13 of his close relatives during the Shoa. 

Had Louis Farrakhan or Mel Gibson said something remotely similar, there would rightly have been an impassioned outcry. 

Some argue that, without disputing the obscene nature of such a remark, allowances should be made for Kissinger, the archetypal Court Jew, who was so desperate to compensate for his Jewishness that he may "unconsciously" have been seeking to reassure his anti-Semitic President that he was not under the influence of the "Elders of Zion." 

In his book, Yehuda Avner quotes Willie Fort, a psychiatrist and fellow refugee acquainted with the Kissinger family before they left Germany, observing that some people tend "to lean over backward in favor of the other side to prove being evenhanded and objective". Fort believed that Kissinger was so consumed with his Jewish refugee complex and need to demonstrate his loyalty to Nixon that he simply could not cope with the situation. [See Avner p.269] 

Nixon recognized this saying: "what it is, is the insecurity. It's the latent insecurity. Most Jewish people are insecure and that's why they have to prove things." 

Far from apologizing now for his outburst Kissinger justified it. In an email to the JTA, he insisted that the most callous statement about Jews ever recorded by a senior US official "had to be viewed in the context of what was happening". 

Kissinger at the time had just lost a tough battle with Senator Henry Jackson who had managed to persuade Congress to adopt the Jackson-Vanik amendment linking trade with the Soviet Union to the extension of human rights and freedom of emigration. Whilst this proved to be a turning point and a major victory for the campaign to free Soviet Jewry, it was enormously frustrating for Kissinger, whose principal objective was to bring about detente with the Soviet Union, even if that required ignoring human rights violations including the persecution of his own people. But even allowing for ruthless realpolitik could that conceivably have warranted such an unconscionable outburst? 

There were other occasions when Kissinger adopted inexplicably negative attitudes relating to Jews. For example, he opposed the construction of the US Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington claiming that it would provide too high a profile for the Jews and reignite anti-Semitism. Yet this did not prevent him in 2007 from being the keynote speaker at the New York Holocaust commemoration at the Museum of the Jewish Heritage. 

In a column in the New York Jewish Week, Menachem Rosensaft of the American Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors called on Jewish organizations which had previously honored Kissinger, to strip him of his honorary doctorates, medals and awards. He caustically suggested that Kissinger still felt closer to Germany than to his Jewishness, noting that in 2007 when receiving a medal from the German state of Baden-Wurttemberg, Kissinger had referred vaguely to "the difficulties of my childhood" and then went on to lavishly praise Germany without making any reference to Nazism or the Holocaust. 

One can only say God help us from dependency on Jews appointed or elected to public office who subsequently feel a need to grovel to their peers about their loyalty by demonstrating that their Jewishness is inconsequential. 

On the other hand, there is a profound difference between "court Jews" like Kissinger and those Jews who worked under both Democratic and Republican Administrations and had no inhibitions or psychological constraints about their Jewish affiliation. They performed far better in their positions than those desperately seeking to display aloofness from their Jewish background.

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Scholarly Palestinian Arab Scientific Research

After days, maybe even a week or so, of intense historic, archaeological and scientific research, the Palestinian Authority released their five page tome proving without a doubt, no question, Jews have no connection to the Western Wall. There we go, all done. No debate needed. Pheww! Glad that ones over. Thanks Arabs for another great scientific contribution to the world. That would still make........hmmm NONE!

Just when you think they have out-dumbed themselves and can’t get any dumber, off they go and top their last idiotic act, which seems impossible. I guess it must be now. The way I heard it Muslims invented air and water too.

The Palestinian Authority's top researchers hard at work:

Friday, November 12, 2010

Welcome Back Khadr











Romeo Dallaire                                                     Omar Khadr
Former Canadian Soldier,                               Former Al-Qaeda soldier
now a Liberal Senator                                     current Liberal darling

Senator Dallaire has called for the repatriation of Omar Khadr to Canada and suggesting that he be treated as a child soldier reminding Canadians of our obligations internationally and suggesting that our image in the world has suffered as result of not doing so earlier.

So let me see....obligation and image...hmmmmm

My first reaction is,” I can’t believe any serious military man would be a Liberal”, and secondly this man has and continues to be above criticism for his political positions. No one in the media seems to challenge him and I am assuming because of the horrors he witnessed in his capacity of commander of the UN troops in Rwanda or maybe simply because he is a liberal. That, along with his psychological breakdown and suicide attempts no one wants to be seen as uncaring, unsympathetic or ungrateful to a damaged war vet. Well, Bullshit! This is so Canadian it is stomach churning.

If you are going to go public on issues that affect Canadians, their lives and public policy then be prepared for the heat, the fight and the criticism. I don’t know but I would prefer a General more than a social worker down at the municipal welfare office. What kind of Generals are we producing? I want tough as nails with brains Generals not some squishy, touchy feely, multiculti , politically correct guys.

I wonder what the other soldiers have to say who also witnessed the Rwandan barbarity and had to fight it and clean it up afterward? Not a word about them. Has anyone asked any of the other officers and fighting men for their opinions? Do they concur with the General? What of the Belgian soldiers? What are their opinions? Who from that preventable and criminal event has prospered? We Canadians are so polite that we dare not ask the tough questions that need to be asked. We leave that to historians, with time passed no one is harmed, feelings not hurt nor offended. Soo Canadian, kinda maple syrupy

Within Canada, to many, the good General is a hero, a Canadian legend, an iconic Canadian. There are schools named after the man. None in Europe, mind you, and especially not Belgium. Indeed in Belgium he was a wanted man for prosecution of his actions or lack thereof in Rwanda.

From Wikipedia:

[Dallaire has voluntarily avoided travelling to Belgium to testify in a Belgian Senate Commission investigating the deaths of Belgian troops.Belgian authorities have stated that they would seek a penal indictment over his role in the deaths of the Belgian paratroopers. The Belgian Minister of Foreign Affairs has also challenged Dallaire's assertions regarding Belgium's role in Rwanda, saying that "...Dallaire was insulting in his comments and whose cowardice was demonstrated by a lack of responsibility when the situation required leadership on his part."

Further, retired Canadian General Lewis MacKenzie has publicly disagreed with Dallaire's decision to place the UN mission ahead of individual soldiers in Rwanda. Dallaire chose to not mount a rescue of the Belgians under his command, and ten Belgian paratroopers were subsequently murdered. That is a considerable burden to carry the rest of your life. Knowing that you personally sent ten of your best soldiers to their death and you could have prevented those murders.]


Senator Romeo Dallaire was eventually found not responsible for the murders of the ten Belgian soldiers in a military court in 1997.

This story is of legend in Canada and if one listens to the CBC and the liberal media this man is a hero. One only needs to ask the families of the Belgians slaughtered if he really is. A General looks after his own and I don’t hear a lot about those who were left to be cut to pieces as their General witnessed and drove by.

There are many articles on the issues but read others for a fuller understanding and avoid the Dallaire book only as it may be seen as self serving. The internet has it covered extensively; ten Belgium paratroopers were murdered by the Rwanda army. A murder that may have been prevented by the General’s intervention to which he refused even after pleads from the Belgian military that were there under his command at the time. The Belgian military left soon after collecting their butchered dead, leaving his command and the country.

This being said, the General now wants to lecture Canadians on being good citizens. He wants Omar Khadr home in Canada, free and with his family. After all he is “a child soldier”. The world has changed and so has Canada, General. The world is a far more cruel and dangerous a place than it was. People are trying to kill us because we are Canadians, General, and one of those people is... or was Omar Khadr.

From Sara Hampson, Globe and Mail:

"In his new book, Mr. Dallaire takes a hard look at the recruitment and coercion of child soldiers (250,000 boys and girls around the world), a phenomenon he has studied for more than 10 years (at Harvard University’s Carr Center for Human Rights Policy and at Dalhousie University in Halifax) after encountering some of them in Rwanda. Rather than focusing exclusively on their rehabilitation and reintegration – the picking up of their psychological pieces after the conflict is over – he describes them as a “weapons system,” in an effort to bring about the eradication of their use in the first place. Understanding how they are abducted from their families, equipped with light arms because of their proliferation around the world, and forced through rape, drugs and other abuse to fight when they have no understanding of the complex issues involved should not leave readers in despair, he says rather with a sense of outrage and the need for intervention."

None of the above applies to Omar Khadr. He was born into a religious family of Islamists who believe in the destruction of western civilization. No coercion, no rape, no drugs no abuse. By all accounts a very tight, loving and caring family environment. Omar Khadr was and is an admitted soldier and murderer. Canada and Canadians should not be backing his play or listening to the advice of the good General.

From Ezra Levant:

Khadr admits to replaying the murder in his mind for pleasure. His lawyers admit he needs to be deradicalized. The prosecution’s psychiatrist, Dr. Michael Welner, interviewed Khadr and testified he is a master manipulator, regarded as a jihadist leader. Which raises another question: Why didn’t Khadr’s lawyers bring evidence to rebut Welner’s testimony?


Because they had none. Khadr’s team had two psychologists and a psychiatrist. But it’s hard for medical professionals to pretend a remorseless killer is innocent. So they never took the witness stand.

And again Ezra:

When prison life got Omar Khadr down, he said he would think about how it felt to kill Christopher Speer, the U.S. army medic he murdered in Afghanistan.

Daydreaming about murdering Speer “would make him feel good.” He “felt happy” when he learned that Speer had died.

Khadr said building remote-controlled roadside bombs to kill American soldiers in Afghanistan was “the proudest moment of his life.” He had a special hatred for Jews.


That’s no run-of-the-mill murderer. That’s Russell Williams stuff. It’s Paul Bernardo territory. Normal people would feel remorse or disgust at taking a life. Only psychopaths feel pleasure and re-enact the murderers again and again in their minds.


Let po, po Omar do his time....he did the crime!

It’s really unfortunate that we cannot convince his family join him.

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Hmmmm? Say it ain't so, Sean


The uplifted right eyebrow betrayed him. Could it be that he is the author of the infamous “Blue Book”. All kidding aside I could not resist tracking down this book after the discourse between Mark Steyn and the self described Journalism Doctor from Steyn archives. I finally tracked down a copy of this book. It is real and the contents are unbelievable from a Western perspective. I can not quite get my head around the main stream media’s neglect in reviewing this book but they are teaching me each and everyday how useless they are. If a Christian leader wrote such a tract the media would be all over them destroying their reputation, their credibility and anyone associated with them.

But back to Steynamite and Journodoc I have read this discourse many times between the two with great amusement. Mark takes this puffed up English major BA grad from Western University, dressed up for Halloween as a college professor, and evisiorates him not unlike lambs during Eid. For those of you who have not had the opportunity. Enjoy a classic take down and gutting.....let him bleed out.

http://www.steynonline.com/content/view/1516/26


Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Remembering the Holocaust

The following is excerpted from Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s speech on Parliament Hill Monday to a gathering of international parliamentarians and experts attending a conference on combating anti-Semitism:

Two weeks ago I visited Ukraine for the first time. At the killing grounds of Babyn Yar, I knew I was standing in a place where evil – evil at its most cruel, obscene, and grotesque – had been unleashed. But while evil of this magnitude may be unfathomable, it is nonetheless a fact.

It is a fact of history. And it is a fact of our nature – that humans can choose to be inhuman. This is the paradox of freedom. That awesome power, that grave responsibility – to choose between good and evil.

Let us not forget that even in the darkest hours of the Holocaust, men were free to choose good. And some did. That is the eternal witness of the Righteous Among the Nations.

And let us not forget that even now, there are those who would choose evil, and would launch another Holocaust, if left unchecked. That is the challenge before us today.

In response to this resurgence of moral ambivalence on these issues, we must speak clearly.

Remembering the Holocaust is not merely an act of historical recognition. It must also be an understanding and an undertaking. An understanding that the same threats exist today. And an undertaking of a solemn responsibility to fight those threats.

Jews today in many parts of the world and many different settings are increasingly subjected to vandalism, threats, slurs, and just plain, old-fashioned lies.

Let me draw your attention to some particularly disturbing trends.

Anti-Semitism has gained a place at our universities, where at times it is not the mob who are removed, but the Jewish students under attack. And, under the shadow of a hateful ideology with global ambitions, one which targets the Jewish homeland as a scapegoat, Jews are savagely attacked around the world – such as, most appallingly, in Mumbai in 2008.

We have seen all this before. And we have no excuse to be complacent. In fact we have a duty to take action. And for all of us, that starts at home.

In Canada , we have taken a number of steps to assess and combat anti-Semitism in our own country. But of course we must also combat anti-Semitism beyond our borders, - an evolving, global phenomenon. And we must recognize, that while its substance is as crude as ever, its method is now more sophisticated.

Harnessing disparate anti-Semitic, anti-American and anti-Western ideologies, it targets the Jewish people by targeting the Jewish homeland, Israel, as the source of injustice and conflict in the world, and uses, perversely, the language of human rights to do so.

We must be relentless in exposing this new anti-Semitism for what it is. Of course, like any country, Israel may be subjected to fair criticism. And like any free country, Israel subjects itself to such criticism – healthy, necessary, democratic debate. But when Israel , the only country in the world whose very existence is under attack – Is consistently and conspicuously singled out for condemnation, I believe we are morally obligated to take a stand. Demonization, double standards, delegitimization, the 3 D’s, it is a responsibility, to stand up to them.

And I know, by the way, because I have the bruises to show for it, that whether it is at the United Nations, or any other international forum, the easy thing to do is simply to just get along and go along with this anti-Israeli rhetoric, to pretend it is just being even-handed, and to excuse oneself with the label of “honest broker.” There are, after all, a lot more votes, a lot more, in being anti-Israeli than in taking a stand. But, as long as I am Prime Minister, whether it is at the UN or the Francophonie or anywhere else, Canada will take that stand, whatever the cost. Not just because it is the right thing to do, but because history shows us, and the ideology of the anti-Israeli mob tells us all too well, that those who threaten the existence of the Jewish people are, in the longer term, a threat to all of us.

Earlier I noted the paradox of freedom. It is freedom that makes us human. Whether it leads to heroism or depravity depends on how we use it.

We are free citizens, but also the elected representatives of free peoples. We have a solemn duty to defend the vulnerable, to challenge the aggressor, to protect and promote human dignity, at home and abroad. None of us knows whether we would choose to do good, in the extreme circumstances of the Righteous. But we do know there are those today who would choose to do evil, if they are so permitted. Thus, we must use our freedom now, and them and their anti-Semitism at every turn.

Our work together is a sign of hope, just as the existence and persistence of the Jewish homeland is a sign of hope. And it is here that history serves not to warn but to inspire.

As I said on the 60th anniversary of its founding, the State of Israel appeared as a light, in a world emerging from deep darkness. Against all odds, that light has not been extinguished. It burns bright, upheld by the universal principles of all civilized nations – freedom, democracy, justice.

By working together more closely in the family of civilized nations, we affirm and strengthen those principles. And we declare our faith in humanity’s future, in the power of good over evil.

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

IT WAS CLOSE BUT WE STILL WON

IT WAS CLOSE BUT WE STILL WON

American Voters take Obama and the Coruptocrats out back to the wood shed for a little bit of a tune up. “Ears” just doesn’t get it....yet. Maybe another trip? Anyone....ideas?

“We don’t mind the Republicans joining us,” “Ears“remarked to a partisan rally “They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in the back.”

I want them just to get out of the way” and “don’t do a lot of talking,” "Ears" smugly remarked over the stimulus spending.

“I probably should have used the word ‘opponents’ instead of ‘enemies’ “Ears” describing the Republicans.


From his speech 03/11/2010

“No one party will be able to dictate where we go from here,” he told a press conference Wednesday, calling for both parties to work together to tackle the problems facing the country.

“No person, no party, has a monopoly on wisdom,” he added.

“There are going to be areas of policy where we’re going to have to do a better job,” he conceded. He defended his economic recovery package and the bank and auto industry bailouts saying that they were a “response to an emergency”.

Obama rejected the notion that the election results are a rejection of his policies, but their results.

“Voters are not satisfied with the outcomes,” he said.

Well, I want somebody to tell me what is fair about one incompetent having the right to systematically destroy my country. I want to know where the fairness is in that.
I want to know why in hell anybody is even thinking about much less talking about compromising with this man. I want to know why anybody who believes in the Constitution wants to discuss compromising individual freedom or liberty with this man
Rush Limbaugh 03/11/2010.

Saturday, October 30, 2010

It is by Design

  It is happening worldwide. It is not isolated. It is not unorganized. No matter where one looks the world over “It is happening”. The demands, the threats, the violence. The “Noise”!

China, Chechnya, Bosnia, Germany, Italy, France, Spain, England, Australia, USA, Canada, Denmark, Sweden, Norway and on and on the war against the host has taken root. The host in fact are so shocked and unaccustomed to the hate and venom spewed at them from their ungrateful arrivals that they have become totally perplexed and paralyzed with indecision. “What is wrong?, what did we do wrong?, where did we go wrong?” they ask, and finally “how can we fix it and make it better”. The elites of this multicultural pea soup believe not enough multicultural inclusiveness has been proffered to these poor misunderstood misogynists. The elites throw more and more bread to the ”Noise” just to find that there isn’t enough wheat in this world for all the baked bread needed to quiet this “Noise”. Oh sweet, sweet quiet, when shall that be? This almost sounds like the plot in a science fiction thriller but it is very real still yet, surreal.

From Muslim Brotherhood Documents captured by the FBI in Virginia 2004

“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ’sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

(where this reads “America” simply replace with the name of your own country.)

“Phase One: Phase of discreet and secret establishment of leadership.

“Phase Two: Phase of gradual appearance on the public scene and exercising and utilizing various public activities (It greatly succeeded in implementing this stage). It also succeeded in achieving a great deal of its important goals, such as infiltrating various sectors of the Government. Gaining religious institutions and embracing senior scholars. Gaining public support and sympathy. Establishing a shadow government (secret) within the Government.

“Phase Three: Escalation phase, prior to conflict and confrontation with the rulers, through utilizing mass media. Currently in progress.

“Phase Four: Open public confrontation with the Government through exercising the political pressure approach. It is aggressively implementing the above-mentioned approach. Training on the use of weapons domestically and overseas in anticipation of zero-hour. It has noticeable activities in this regard.

“Phase Five: Seizing power to establish their Islamic Nation under which all parties and Islamic groups are united.”

This document offers a chilling operational insight into the mindset, planning, and vision of the Islamic movement in North America.

The Implementation of Shariah by the Muslim Brotherhood

The Elbarasse archives and close observation of the Brotherhood’s operations reveal the following as the most important of the techniques employed by the Ikhwan in America to achieve the seditious goals of its civilization jihad:

• Expanding the Muslim presence by birth rate, immigration, and refusal to assimilate;

• Occupying and expanding domination of physical spaces;

• Ensuring the “Muslim Community” knows and follows MB doctrine;

• Controlling the language we use in describing the enemy;

• Ensuring we do not study their doctrine (shariah);

• Co-opting key leadership;

• Forcing compliance with shariah at local levels;

• Fighting all counterterrorism efforts;

• Subverting religious organizations;

• Employing lawfare – the offensive use of lawsuits and threats of lawsuits;

• Claiming victimization / demanding accommodations;

• Condemning “slander” against Islam;

• Subverting the U.S. education system, in particular, infiltrating and dominating U.S. Middle East studies programs;

• Demanding the right to practice shariah in segregated Muslim enclaves;

• Demanding recognition of shariah in non-Muslim spheres;

• Confronting and denouncing Western society, laws, and traditions; and

• Demanding that shariah replace Western law. Note that many of the foregoing techniques entail, in one way or another, influencing and neutralizing the American government at all levels.


From Andrew Breitbart “BIG PEACE”

When they have succeeded there shall be quiet, “ ah sweet quiet”. Our elites,... Fools... all of them.

In many parts of the world the sleeping ones are beginning to awaken from their slumber. They are awakened by the “Noise” not understanding how a guest invited to their home, indeed invited to live in their home to share what they have to offer has now become unacceptable.

“Your food is unclean”,“your dress too provocative”, “your education system not of us ...we need our own. We do not believe in your justice system, we will have our own, (sharia). The “Noise” has become deafening and more than threatening, they have begun action.

There are those among us who have awakened before most. Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs, (a heroine of our time), has been fighting this battle on the front lines for years. She has taken hit after hit from the “Noise Makers” and their “useless idiots” in the media trying to shut her down. She is as tough as dried leather but not too hard to look at. A real fighter. God bless this lady.

Robert Spencer, Jihad Watch, the “Jew”, his parents didn’t tell him so. He is a scholar! Come and debate him, anyone...huh....anyone? This man has been with Pamela all the way. A great tag team effort. This man disassembles and dispatches every fool the”Noise” produces with artful ease.

There are many more important and skilful warriors against the sea of fools however I am limiting to these two stalwarts in this piece as they have carried the heaviest burden and they are now under tremendous attack from the media at every turn. The lies, the twisting of facts and words, the total fabrication of stories to discredit them, especially Pamela, is beyond the pale. Support these two...go to their sites, read their blogs, donate, donate, donate. They are fighting the good fight for all.

Who knows where all this will end, not I, but something takes me to the French Revolution when a society became so disconnected from itself action had to happen. When a disconnect takes place between the slumbering and the elites and their enablers, (media), slumberers win every time. Always! Check your history.

The “Noise” will end.

Thursday, October 21, 2010

A REAL genocide in the making

I was doing some research into the faux genocide that our friends of the other religious persuasion, (that being them Episcopalians), keep insisting is taking place in Israel. Oh, the ethnic cleansing, the war crimes and of course the targeting of the children. The whiiiiiining, the screaming hysterically, the prostrating, Episcopalians get a grip. Think control. Think Truth.

On my journey I came upon a real genocide that is taking place. One that will erupt upon the death of one of that countries iconic father figures and indeed a world treasure that all world leaders, musicians, Hollywood misfits and vermin of all colours scramble to have their pictures taken with. That would be Nelson Mandela and the country South Africa. The victims of this genocide are white Afrikaners, the Boers, (farmer in Afrikaner) and Indian farmers. 

“The Boers—or farmers—of South Africa have tilled the land for generations, on small holdings or on large commercial farms. But orgiastic killing sprees by The People, in combination with a Stalinesque land grab by their representatives, is threatening this minority's survival.” Ilana Mercer.com 

“South Africa's ruling African National Congress (ANC) finally told its members to stop singing the song "Kill the Boer" -- that is, murder white South Africans. ("Boer" is Afrikaans for "farmer," but colloquially, it is a disparaging term for any white South African.) This came after ANC Youth League leader Julius Malema defied a court ruling and kept singing the song (he still refuses to stop).” Pamela Geller, American Thinker.

Dr. Gregory Stanton of Genocide Watch already started warning in 2002 that “the South African farmers are the single group of people most targeted by mindless murders in the entire world.”

White citizens of South Africa have experienced violence from their black fellow citizen like no other people on the planet. Since the ANC came to power in 1994, 45,000 to 50,000 white citizens have been murdered. Over 90,000 children, young girls and women have been raped. Boer farmers represent 40,000 SA’s of which well over 3,000 have been murdered. They are being murdered at four times the national average which discounting the Boers is the worse murder rate in the world. These farmer murders are the vilest and reprehensible murders in that the victims are raped, viciously tortured having boiling water poured down their throats, burned with irons, tendons cut, sexual mutilations and finally having their throats cut. Many, many more have survived attacks, robberies, and random beatings. Genocide Watch believes that that since the ANC has come to power in 1994 the crimes statistics are much higher and with the help of the government, the police and the world press they have managed to cover it up. Indeed the South African police and government have stopped reporting Black on White crime statistics to hide what is happening from the rest of the world.

“Sybille”, full name is not known and prefers to remain so and to be known only as “Sybille” from blogspot.com 

Sybille writes: “Gang rapes of white victims in holding cells in South Africa take place on a regular basis and are only reported when some of the victims sue the police and government. These gang rapes by black inmates in holding cells committed on solitary white victims, are in fact war crimes, acts of aggression in a sexual manner, under conditions of coercion intended to humiliate and degrade the victim, and has nothing to do with sexual gratification. These white men (and at times also white women) are usually arrested on spurious charges. 

Some are arrested for ‘speeding’, even though many deny they were in fact speeding. Some are arrested for ‘outstanding fines’. Most of the time, the ‘charges’ are dropped after they have been brutalized and gang-raped in police cells. 

Some are arrested for ‘being witnesses to other incidents, one was arrested for crimen injuria’which he denies took place. What they all have in common is that they were put in holding cells with large crowds of hardened black criminals who then preceded to gang-rape them. Some of these men also reported that the black police egged these rapists on to rape them… to ‘teach the white man a lesson’. 

Black African males in South-Africa view themselves as victors of a racial war, and view these white men as members of the conquered tribe. “This is a description by Gayton McKenzie, a hardened gang member, of the rape of a young white teenager only known as Wimpie. Where is Wimpie today? Probably dead of Aids, or suicide, as so many male victims of gang rape. If he is alive he might be homeless, addicted to drugs or alcohol as many who do manage to survive the experience. Their lives in ruins around them. “

“Wimpie, a white boy who was dabbling with dagga, is put in our cell. I don’t know how old he really is, perhaps 16 or more, but he looks no older than 14, with skinny arms and short, spiky-crowned, brown hair. He tries to fight, and so they hit him. His resistance stops abruptly when one grabs the back of his head and smashes his face into the steel bars. The 20 men take it in turns to rape him. It goes on for more than eight hours, almost the whole night. The boy does everything he can, in his pathetic, limited range of action, to try to deter them, but he is ignored. He screams, he cries, he begs, he tries to bargain, he prays. It is in the morning, though, that I am forced to see what life has coughed up before me. What’s left of Wimpie is lying in a corridor between the bunks, just in front of my bed. He is still naked, shivering in a pool of his own blood where they have discarded him. I will literally have to step over the small body to go and eat my breakfast.”

“What is happening in South Africa against the white population is a crime against humanity. Savage. And no one will speak of it. The leftist media (all big media) and the international community (notoriously left-leaning) ignore it entirely. Their silence is affirmation; it sanctions the evil. Most decent people are perplexed by the uneven humanity and inhumanity of our leftist moral "superiors." I am not. They unremittingly vilify the Jewish people and Israel, the most benevolent government and army in the Middle East, but pay scant attention to jihad and the Islamic culture of honor killings, clitorectomies, child slavery, forced marriage, child marriage, etc. Why? Because the leftists are bigots and racists, that's why. Because as morally superior as they think they are, they have no regard for their own side's perpetrators of violence, like the black South Africans. Their subliminal message is clear: "They're animals, whaddaya expect?" That is their prejudice. It's the soft bigotry of low expectations. The genocide of white South Africans? Yawn. Whaddaya expect?” Pamela Geller, American Thinker, April 2010 

“According to Dr Gregory Stanton, an American genocide expert who founded the organization Genocide Watch, “these mysterious murders on South African farmers fall under genocidal attacks - even though such a small group of people is involved.” He already issued a call in 2002, warning that these attacks were increasing in intensity, accompanied by growing hate-speech by government officials targeting white farmers, and would eventually culminate in an all-out genocide unless the authorities intervened. See his report and his video explaining the nature of genocide above, and here The SA government however calls these 'ordinary crimes'. 

The number of food-producing commercial farms in South Africa has dropped from 85,000 in 1994 to a mere 11,500 this year, according to SA tax records. This has in turn also caused massive unemployment among farm-workers: 1,2million were employed on white-owned farms in 1994, only 360,000 now remain.
Most SA farm workers live on cottages on the farms with their often very large, extended families. The effect on the white Afrikaner families has also been devastating: many have left the country, but most now are now destitute and unemployed and live in religious communes, trying to eke out a living from subsistence crop-growing. More than one-million of the country's three-million Afrikaners now are totally destitute and homeless - and this happened since 1994. 

Thus the depopulation of white farms due to this ongoing violence is also causing a knock-on effect, with squatter towns growing larger every time jobless farm workers move away from desolate farms after such murders. Less than one percent of the entire South African land surface is now used for irrigated crop-production, causing local food prices to triple this past year. In 1994 about 6% of the entire SA land-surface was still used by commercial farmers: the rest of the country is not suitable for crop-growing for the marketplace.”Ever since my retirement as a South African journalist, I have been recording these attacks from a great variety of South African sources on m y own website.” Adriana Stuijt retired South African Journalist

None of the North American media are reporting this genocide. Neither are the European media. The left must obviously believe these people deserve what they get for being white. They forget that many of the people who are the targets of this violence are the white poor, less affluent and less educated even under the pre 1994 governments. For them life has become far worse than anyone would have believed. Today over 70 White peoples tent communities have arisen around South African cities: Johannesburg, Pretoria, Cape Town and others. Most of these people are unemployed losing their jobs through reverse discrimination to provide for black South Africans. They lack electricity, sewage and of course security. They have become the target of black crime that the government refuses to acknowledge. 

When I started my research into the allegations of the “Others,” (Episcopalians of course), I was confounded by the absolute lack of any credible evidence of atrocities in Lebanon or the West bank or Gaza committed by Israel. The most Orwellian part of this international collaboration against Israel is they managed to get a South African Jewish Judge to conduct an investigation, (The Goldstone Report), which found Israel wanting and guilty. I was dumbfounded… times three. What am I missing? Jewish Judge, South African, judging Israel?

The dream of a new dawn for South Africa as the rainbow nation has fast faded with this near failed state but it remains the dream, a fantasy, of the Western elites and their media. SA Blacks especially the ANC youth wing still sing “Kill the Boer” all over South Africa despite being told to cease. White South African's are very aware of what is in store for them when Mandela passes.

“Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer”- Peter Mokaba (ANC).
“When Mandela dies we will kill you whites like flies”- Mzukizi Gaba (ANC)
“We the members of MK have pledged ourselves to kill them, the whites”- Nelson Mandela
“Light, when suddenly let in, dazzles and hurts and almost blinds us: but this soon passes away, and it seems to become the only element we can exist in.” ~Augustus William Hare and Julius Charles Hare, Guesses at Truth, by Two Brothers, 1827 

Main Stream Media let the light shine in and cease feeding us politically correct “Crap Sandwiches”. Crap sandwiches credited to Michelle Malkin. Beautiful. 

Big Brother

Sunday, October 17, 2010

Multiculturalism has “utterly failed”



German Chanceler Angela Merkel states that multiculturalism has “utterly failed”.

Hallelujah! Now I feel vindicated and not alone.

Multiculturalism in Canada

The faces of some of our prized multicultural benefactors and what they have to say…

Meet Wahida Valiante, Kashmir/Indian Canadian, MSW Family Counsellor, Ottawa Ontario Canada, and current president of the Canadian Islamic Congress.

“They spew hate against Islam and Muslims by repeating the same racist and bigoted statements over and over again: that Islam is violent, irrational and incompatible with democracy. Out of FEAR, I have chosen not to name the pro-Israeli Zionists, or the Israel-can- do-no-wrong gang, who promote fear of Islam and Muslims through propaganda, and by playing manipulative mind-games on unsuspecting, decent mainstream Canadian and Americans.”

And

“The Zionist zealots (neo-conservative Likud Party supporters who yoke Israel's interests to those of America) and rightwing evangelical "millennial" or end-time Christians, both raise the spectre of "Islamic terrorism" as a force that threatens free people everywhere. They know that fear destroys reason, leaving the individual's conscience in the hands of those who instill the fear. Similarly, Fascism and Zionism achieved their objectives through fear, resulting in the vast societal FEAR syndrome.”

And

From Backseat Blogger, October 4, 2010:

On April 29, 2005 Ms. Valiante did not have nearly so much luck when she wrote in the CIC’s official rag that Daniel Pipes, a well-known and vocal critic of Islamic extremism, “is a follower of Hitler “, “uses the tactics of Hitler” and “wants to ethnically cleanse America of its Muslim presence.”

After Mr. Pipes forcefully denied uttering such statements and filed suit for libel, Ms Valiante abjectly apologized.

The CIC subsequently apologized “without reservation” and “retract[ed the] remarks in the column.” The CIC also sent funds to cover Pipes’ legal expenses and made a donation in his name to a Canadian charity. Pipes stated that the CIC’s apology establishes that, in Canada, “Islamist groups do not have impunity to fabricate lies about their opponents.”

Dr. Mohamed Elmasry, Egyptian Canadian, retired professor of engineering University of Waterloo and former president of the Canadian Islamic Congress.

Rosie DiManno - Toronto Star Oct 27, 2004:

“And these are Elmasry's words, during a discussion of terrorism on The Michael Coren Show last week, wherein he declared that all adult Israeli civilians (over 18), regardless of gender, are fair targets, ostensibly because a term of military service is mandatory for nearly all Israelis. "They are not innocent if they are part of a population which is ... (the) total population of Israel is part of the army ... even if they have civilian clothes ... The same if they are women in the army ... anybody above 18 is a part of the Israeli popular army.''

And

From Ezra Levant, lawyer, author and former publisher of the Western Standard in the National Post:

Elmasry accuses the Jews of ethnic cleansing, of apartheid and of being the instigators behind the invasion of Iraq. One of the site's specialties is rooting out the Jewish "cabal" that runs the Canadian government.
I sat on a panel with Elmasry at the Canadian Association of Journalists meeting in Halifax last month, and was subjected to a lengthy rant against the "zhoos" who control the media, the "zhoos" who are "on top" of the world and keep the Muslims on "the bottom," and about how my own comments were suspect because I, too, was a "zhoo".

And

From Tarek Fatah, a Canadian political activist, writer, and broadcaster and founder of the Muslim Canadian Congress writing in the National Post:


“Yesterday, in an op-ed piece distributed on his e-mail list, Elmasry accused Prime Minister Stephen Harper of being a racist, saying the PM remains indifferent to Omar Khadr’s plight because the young man is “brown-skinned.”

And if playing the race card was not enough, Elmasry compared Omar Khadr's internment to that of William Sampson who was sentenced to death in Saudi Arabia in 2003. Elmasry asked: “Why is Stephen Harper so callously indifferent to Omar Khadr’s case? It’s painfully obvious: William Sampson is a white Westerner while his fellow Canadian citizen, Omar Khadr, is brown-skinned and a Muslim.”

Did it occur to Elmasry that William Sampson had not gone to Saudi Arabia to wage a crusade against Islam while Khadr was a recruit in Osama Bin Laden's jihad against Canada and its coalition partners in NATO? “

Read more: http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2008/07/22/tarek-fatah-on-mohamed-elmasry-canadian-islamic-congress-president-plays-the-race-card-badly.aspx#ixzz12dlyxIZm

Khaled Mouammar, Palestinian Canadian, former president of the Canadian Arab Federation:

"We would also like to remind Jason Kenney that he is a Minister of the Canadian government, not the racist Israeli government; still, CAF is not surprised with Minister Kenney's position given his outright contempt for the Arab and Muslim communities in Canada and his condoning of Islamophobia. This is the same man who attacked a Muslim organization for lodging a complaint with the Ontario Human Rights Commission against Maclean's Magazine for publishing an inflammatory and bigoted article, and who slandered Canadian NGO's at an OSCE Conference in front of the international community", said Khaled Mouammar, CAF National President.

And

“The evidence has been accumulating about the anti-Arab and anti-Islamic Canadian government to the extent it is feared that if Canada gains a seat in the UN Security Council, it may be used against Arabs and Muslims around the world. The Canadian Arab Federation calls upon all Arab and Muslim Missions at the United Nations to vote against Canada’s bid to have a seat at the UN Security Council for the following reasons…”
“Canada is the only western country that has refused to ask for the repatriation of its citizen, 15-year-old Omar Khadr, from the jail in Guantanamo Bay where he has languished since May 2005.”

“Since coming to power in February 2006 the Harper government has refused to deal with the Canadian Arab Federation and the Canadian Islamic Congress, the two main national organizations representing Arab and Muslim Canadians, because they advocate for Palestinian rights.”

“March 2006: Canada was the first country (after Israel) to cut its assistance to the Palestinian Authority. The aid cutoff, which was designed to sow division within Palestinian society, had devastating social effects.”

And much more at Blog Wrath.

Omar Shaban, Canadian Lebanese, a student at UBC and former executive vice president of the Canadian Arab Federation for Western Canada

He adds writing on his Facebook page that Canada was "genocidal state" and referred to Canada's national holiday as "Fuck Canada Day" and added that "It's finally Canada Day...Couldn't be more ashamed to be Canadian."

The CAF distanced itself from Shaban’s statements but he refused to retract his remarks. Omar Shaban chose to resign from the CAF. He continues his vulgar racist and un-Canadian spewing on the campus of the University of British Columbia. When asked by a journalist why he remains here in Canada if he finds it so abhorrent he remarked that he was not finished his studies and likes school. Unfortunately for us but not so for Shaban he was born in Canada but raised in Lebanon.

Syed Soharwardy, Pakistani Canadian, founder of the Islamic Supreme Council of Canada. His views:

"Sharia cannot be customized for specific countries. These universal, divine laws are for all people of all countries for all times."
"Presently, what Israeli forces are doing to Palestinians is worse than the Holocaust of World War II."

"[Soharwardy's group] . . . strongly condemns the exploitation of tsunami victims by the Christian missionaries. There have been several reports that the Christian missionaries are kidnapping Muslim children in Indonesia. . . . It is now proven that the Christian missionaries do not help people on humanitarian grounds. They help people in order to exploit their needs and convert them to Christianity."

And

"Presently, what Israeli forces are doing to Palestinians is worse than the Holocaust of the World War II"
"More than over a million Palestinians have been killed, millions of them have made refugees, and millions of them are in the concentration camps"

"Majority of the Muslims believes that Muslims could not commit these heinous crimes because of the sophistication and precision in the planning and execution of these terrorist attacks. ... Don't the world understand as to who exactly are the real beneficiaries of this episode. On the other side, who will be suffering the most from these terrorist attacks?"

We are in serious trouble in Canada and I am not sure that political correctness will not prevail to all our detriment.

CHRC's new punishment

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Iggy glee



"This is a government that for four years has basically ignored the United Nations and now is suddenly showing up saying, 'Hey, put us on the council,'" Ignatieff said following a Liberal caucus meeting last month.

"Don't mistake me. I know how important it is for Canada to get a seat on the Security Council, but Canadians have to ask a tough question: Has this government earned that place? We're not convinced it has.”

This mf’er has certainly contributed to what many in the world are saying is an embarrassment to Canada and he is quite happy at the outcome I’m sure. On the contrary I’m very proud of my country’s backbone in giving the middle finger to global warming, (in a most diplomatic way), not giving millions of dollars to African dictators many of whom are not our friends, and of course our strong support for Israel. This man is a bog dweller of the highest order. One should never sell ones country out for political gain. The man is despicable. The UN has long been a cesspool of corruption in need of a thorough cleansing, (get the Clorox out), which now seems impossible since the camel dung kebab eaters of the OIC have become ever more powerful. Maybe it is time the good guys pull out of the UN and establish the UGGs, (United Good Guys) and send these sycophants home. They really are the Entitled Nations not the United Nations.

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

UAE tries to blackmail Canada, Tories stand strong

"Canada refused to grant more landing rights to two state-run airlines from the United Arab Emirates because the UAE tried to "blackmail" it into doing so by using access to a key Dubai military base as a bargaining chip, Conservative sources told CBC News."

"The Canadian Forces have been kicked out of a strategic base that supports operations in Afghanistan after a dispute with the United Arab Emirates over Canadian airport landing slots."

"A military source in Ottawa says the United Arab Emirates closed its airspace Monday to Canadian Defence Minister Peter MacKay and Chief of the Defense Staff Gen. Walt Natynczyk in an escalating diplomatic row over aviation rights."

Monday, October 11, 2010

Whaaat! Foreign contributions? Gotta go. Run Bo Run!

Finally, someone is listening to the issue of foreign contributions to political campaigns, that being "Ears" himself. What he has forgotten are the millions that his campaign took in running for the presidency. Pamela Geller raised the issue in 2008, supplying all the details. Nary a word from the MSM. Now that "Ears" has raised the issue, without one scintilla of evidence against the Chamber of Commerce, all the media are talking about it and the class clown Al Franken is asking for an investigation. Pamela has the goods over at Big Government.

Global Warming: "It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist."

Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Here is his letter of resignation to Curtis G. Callan Jr, Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society.

Dear Curt:
When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood (a threat against which Dwight Eisenhower warned a half-century ago). Indeed, the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of poverty and abstinence—it was World War II that changed all that. The prospect of worldly gain drove few physicists. As recently as thirty-five years ago, when I chaired the first APS study of a contentious social/scientific issue, The Reactor Safety Study, though there were zealots aplenty on the outside there was no hint of inordinate pressure on us as physicists. We were therefore able to produce what I believe was and is an honest appraisal of the situation at that time. We were further enabled by the presence of an oversight committee consisting of Pief Panofsky, Vicki Weisskopf, and Hans Bethe, all towering physicists beyond reproach. I was proud of what we did in a charged atmosphere. In the end the oversight committee, in its report to the APS President, noted the complete independence in which we did the job, and predicted that the report would be attacked from both sides. What greater tribute could there be?

How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money flood has become the raison d’ĂȘtre of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs. For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society.

It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.

So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it. For example:

1. About a year ago a few of us sent an e-mail on the subject to a fraction of the membership. APS ignored the issues, but the then President immediately launched a hostile investigation of where we got the e-mail addresses. In its better days, APS used to encourage discussion of important issues, and indeed the Constitution cites that as its principal purpose. No more. Everything that has been done in the last year has been designed to silence debate

2. The appallingly tendentious APS statement on Climate Change was apparently written in a hurry by a few people over lunch, and is certainly not representative of the talents of APS members as I have long known them. So a few of us petitioned the Council to reconsider it. One of the outstanding marks of (in)distinction in the Statement was the poison word incontrovertible, which describes few items in physics, certainly not this one. In response APS appointed a secret committee that never met, never troubled to speak to any skeptics, yet endorsed the Statement in its entirety. (They did admit that the tone was a bit strong, but amazingly kept the poison word incontrovertible to describe the evidence, a position supported by no one.) In the end, the Council kept the original statement, word for word, but approved a far longer “explanatory” screed, admitting that there were uncertainties, but brushing them aside to give blanket approval to the original. The original Statement, which still stands as the APS position, also contains what I consider pompous and asinine advice to all world governments, as if the APS were master of the universe. It is not, and I am embarrassed that our leaders seem to think it is. This is not fun and games, these are serious matters involving vast fractions of our national substance, and the reputation of the Society as a scientific society is at stake.

3. In the interim the ClimateGate scandal broke into the news, and the machinations of the principal alarmists were revealed to the world. It was a fraud on a scale I have never seen, and I lack the words to describe its enormity. Effect on the APS position: none. None at all. This is not science; other forces are at work.

4. So a few of us tried to bring science into the act (that is, after all, the alleged and historic purpose of APS), and collected the necessary 200+ signatures to bring to the Council a proposal for a Topical Group on Climate Science, thinking that open discussion of the scientific issues, in the best tradition of physics, would be beneficial to all, and also a contribution to the nation. I might note that it was not easy to collect the signatures, since you denied us the use of the APS membership list. We conformed in every way with the requirements of the APS Constitution, and described in great detail what we had in mind—simply to bring the subject into the open.

5. To our amazement, Constitution be damned, you declined to accept our petition, but instead used your own control of the mailing list to run a poll on the members’ interest in a TG on Climate and the Environment. You did ask the members if they would sign a petition to form a TG on your yet-to-be-defined subject, but provided no petition, and got lots of affirmative responses. (If you had asked about sex you would have gotten more expressions of interest.) There was of course no such petition or proposal, and you have now dropped the Environment part, so the whole matter is moot. (Any lawyer will tell you that you cannot collect signatures on a vague petition, and then fill in whatever you like.) The entire purpose of this exercise was to avoid your constitutional responsibility to take our petition to the Council.

6. As of now you have formed still another secret and stacked committee to organize your own TG, simply ignoring our lawful petition.

APS management has gamed the problem from the beginning, to suppress serious conversation about the merits of the climate change claims. Do you wonder that I have lost confidence in the organization?

I do feel the need to add one note, and this is conjecture, since it is always risky to discuss other people’s motives. This scheming at APS HQ is so bizarre that there cannot be a simple explanation for it. Some have held that the physicists of today are not as smart as they used to be, but I don’t think that is an issue. I think it is the money, exactly what Eisenhower warned about a half-century ago. There are indeed trillions of dollars involved, to say nothing of the fame and glory (and frequent trips to exotic islands) that go with being a member of the club. Your own Physics Department (of which you are chairman) would lose millions a year if the global warming bubble burst. When Penn State absolved Mike Mann of wrongdoing, and the University of East Anglia did the same for Phil Jones, they cannot have been unaware of the financial penalty for doing otherwise. As the old saying goes, you don’t have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing. Since I am no philosopher, I’m not going to explore at just which point enlightened self-interest crosses the line into corruption, but a careful reading of the ClimateGate releases makes it clear that this is not an academic question.

I want no part of it, so please accept my resignation. APS no longer represents me, but I hope we are still friends.
Hal

Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, former Chairman; Former member Defense Science Board, chmn of Technology panel; Chairman DSB study on Nuclear Winter; Former member Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Former member, President’s Nuclear Safety Oversight Committee; Chairman APS study on Nuclear Reactor Safety
Chairman Risk Assessment Review Group; Co-founder and former Chairman of JASON; Former member USAF Scientific Advisory Board; Served in US Navy in WW II; books: Technological Risk (about, surprise, technological risk) and Why Flip a Coin (about decision making)